A boardroom review is a procedure that lets a table assess its performance in a comprehensive way. It helps tables identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and their culture as well as other aspects of longevity. It is also a way to ensure that those who pay for membership at a table are properly equipped to fulfill their responsibilities.
This research field is still evolving, and a number of difficulties remain. The evidence available at present shows inconsistent results regarding the impact of dissent on boards and their performance. While some studies report positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear results, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019), non-significant or mixed results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats, 2015; Minichilli boardroombook.com/what-is-a-do-questionnaire/ et al. There are 2012) connections between dissent and the task performance of the board.
The literature doesn’t provide more insight into the factors that influence the dynamics of dissension. Future research should create an integrated theoretical framework to understand this phenomenon of governance. This could involve the use of configuring approaches (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018, Schiell Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to help researchers more precisely understand how individual board attributes processes, contexts, and even processes are connected to the necessary and sufficient causality in governance issues.
Finaly, some studies use an esoteric definition of discord, but don’t provide precise measurement methods. These studies are therefore prone to measurement error. It is worthwhile to develop more robust dissent measurement methods for future studies.